GBA徽标水平 Facebook LinkedIn 电子邮件 Pinterest 推特 Instagram YouTube Icon 导航搜索图标 Main Search Icon 视频播放图标 加上图标 减号图标 Picture icon 汉堡图标 关闭图标 Sorted

Community and Q&A

缺少角落条

新家|发布一般的问题
我删除了我的问题,因为那些责备我理解这个问题的人(即,我们是否真的有我们的基础问题)。
我感谢其他成员与我共享的有用信息。

GBA Prime

加入建筑科学专家的领先社区

成为GBA Prime成员,并立即访问该领域的绿色建筑,研究和报告中的最新发展。

答复

  1. 帕特里克·奥萨利文(Patrick Osullivan)||#1

    >我们已经准备好了基础表格和检查。在几个问题中,我们的检查员提到“横梁角处缺失了角杆。应该添加角杆。”

    您的检查失败了吗?如果不是,为什么不呢?

    >我们的建筑商告诉这不是缺陷。这就是结构工程师设计中推荐的方式。

    我不能明确地解析这一系列陈述。建造者声称这不是缺陷,因为它的设计是如此?还是建造者声称它不是缺陷,但是设计规定它应该存在?

    >我们无法访问结构设计。

    Are you effectively purchasing a finished house upon completion (though you are involved in the build process), or have you contracted a builder to build you a house? These are very different things. If the latter, you should absolutely have access to the plans. If the former, well, you're buying a finished product and all the builder needs to do is fulfill the contractual obligations and comply with local laws and regulations.

    1. 删除||#4

      删除

  2. Expert Member
    马尔科姆·泰勒(Malcolm Taylor)||#2

    新家,

    有一些长度的标准,钢筋必须在拐角处重叠。照片中似乎缺少这种重叠。无论是否在结构图上显示出这种方式,它看起来像是一个缺陷。

    1. 新家||#3

      非常感谢你的回复。如果我们的建筑商没有解决此缺陷,我们将来将遇到什么潜在问题?

      1. Expert Member
        马尔科姆·泰勒(Malcolm Taylor)||#5

        新家,

        可能什么都没有,但是没有圈的区域将是墙壁上的薄弱点。如果他们要失败,那很可能会发生。

        1. 新家||#6

          Thank you so much for your time and for the information!

  3. Walter Ahlgrim||#7

    When you say inspector is this person from the local government there with the power to stop all work.

    我猜没有,这是一名私人检查员。

    You need to tread carefully because at this moment you do not own any part of this building. You own a piece of paper on which they promise to deliver you a house at some time in the future. My guess is that if you read the contract you are not allow on the building site without permission and an escort. Also often they can cancel your contract without any reason if it pleases them and given how much the price of home have increased they could cancel your contract and resell for more money.

    If you want the problem fixed send that photo to the government inspector but you risk being band from the site or canceled.

    https://www.star-telegram.com/news/business/growth/article251873963.html

    沃尔塔

    1. 删除||#9

      删除

  4. Expert Member
    Zephyr7||#8

    您的建筑商说,结构工程师指定这样做。从结构工程师那里获取计划的副本,并根据图纸检查是否安装了东西。如果结构工程师的密封在设计上,则检查员应该可以接受。

    All that said, that corner looks strange to me. I'm used to seeing the rerod bent/formed in the corners, then wired together to make a solid connection. Your installation appears to have cut ends and just a tie where they cross, which is a much weaker connection.

    账单

    1. 新家||#10

      Hello,
      非常感谢您的回复和信息!

  5. Walter Ahlgrim||#11

    What I am saying is the builder you selected is likely a large scale production builder. They have built this model of house hundreds of times this lets them find every short cut and cost saving allowing them to sell the home at a very reasonable price point. It seems your inspector found one of the shortcuts. The chances of the corner of the foundation cracking are likely very slim and likely to be associated another event perhaps seismic or flooding that would disturb the soil under the concrete.

    总的来说,我不是家庭检查行业的粉丝。他们倾向于觉得有必要找到错误的事情才能证明这一点是合理的。

    没有人能保证具体防止破裂。

    在这种情况下,您不想观看正在制作的香肠的过程,而只是享受成品,您会选择合适的人为您完成这项工作。

    沃尔塔

    1. 新家||#12

      Thank you for your opinion.

  6. c l||#13

    新家:
    人们所说的是,您与生产制造商签约,根据建筑商标准合同的条款,以设定的价格为您建造房屋。这个对吗?

    面临的挑战是我们发现自己的市场 - 建筑材料的成本每天上升,分包商的供应有限,熟练潜水艇的供应甚至更有限,而且房屋短缺。您的合同中可能有语言可以允许建设者终止合同。

    So even with only market forces, your builder may find they could sell "your" house today for significantly more than your contract to purchase. Reputable builders will try to honor the agreement for as long as it is tolerable for them. Cancelling contracts can result in bad publicity. But losing money, or leaving $100k's on the table won't let them stay in business long. That is the same situation with every house they are currently building under contract.
    但是,这是一个离群 /吱吱作响的轮子,花费更多的钱,时间,精力,管理,这将激励他们摆脱您。

    基本上,在这个市场上,大多数建筑商不需要“需要”买家 - 他们通常可以转身卖更多。买方“需要”建筑商,因为供应不足。十年前,这被扭转了,您本来会坐在驾驶员的座位上。今天,建造者在驾驶员座位上。

    Read the article Walta linked to. You are in the foundation stage. There will be MANY more things a production builder gets wrong, shortcuts they take, quality that could be better, etc.
    You are probably getting a code minimum house with lipstick on it, the same as all your neighbors. Think about how you want to address such issues going forward. May even be worth it to discuss with the builder.

    对于基金会,如果它符合代码并通过城市/县的检查,那么做更多的工作将使建设者更加损失。获得此地址的唯一方法是为额外的角杆付费。但是,期望支付4倍或更多的材料和劳动力值得...

    您可能希望来理解的yourself and your builder about what types of things you may flag in the future. Or resign yourself that your builder may cancel your contract if there is a list of things after every inspection that this builder normally gets by with. You may want to feel out the builder to see what types of information from your inspections they will welcome - generally the answer is none. Most builders sell you the house with a worthless insurance policy they pay very little for, disguised as a warranty, that is provided by a third party, so once there is a closing the builders responsibility ends. They are not even incentivized to fix something during construction to avoid later callbacks...

    1. 新家||#14

      我的问题是关于缺少角落条以及这可能导致哪些问题(技术)。
      我真的很惊讶人们责怪我的理解是那些缺少角落的人是否是一个重大问题。我对其他事情不感兴趣,请为您的朋友留下建议。

      1. Expert Member
        马尔科姆·泰勒(Malcolm Taylor)||#15

        新家,

        我也对评论的方向感到有些惊讶。这是一个代码或技术问题。无论您是购买制作还是定制房屋与它无关。

        1. 新家||#16

          太感谢了!我真的很感谢您的所有答案!

        2. 新家||#17

          太感谢了!

      2. 帕特里克·奥萨利文(Patrick Osullivan)||#18

        In the future, please don't delete/edit posts to remove the original question. The discussion is healthy, and now the comments don't have anything to refer back to. Everyone on this site is learning together, and it's helpful to have as many details as possible for posterity.

        I don't think anyone is blaming you for wanting to understand the situation, but I think the question mostly seemed as "Builder doing X. Inspector says to do Y." That is one of the trickiest situations to deal with, and it's an incredibly hard thing to litigate from afar.

        在建造中,有些事情是明显的错误。But in this case, particularly when you commented that the builder said "this is how it was recommended in the structural engineer’s design", it's a lot harder to judge what's right or wrong, so the discussion will tend to move towards helping someone understand if such a statement is plausible.

登录或创建一个帐户以发布答案。

Community

最近的问题和答复

  • |
  • |
  • |
  • |