As explained inthe first post关于哈德逊河谷河的建筑GBA正在遵循,最大程度地减少碳排放是一个主要目标。因此,限制所使用的混凝土量是关键。因此,BPC绿色建筑商–Trillium Architects团队规范一个绝缘复合水泥e form (ICCF) foundation, specifically完美的块from Eco Building Systems.
Project Manager Ben Bogie found The Perfect Block throughSteve Baczek, who is a fan of the product. Manufactured in Arizona (and soon Virginia), it is made with ground recycled EPS foam that is mixed with binding agents and cement; the resulting block is roughly 87% insulation.
The difference betweenICFSand ICCFs is that the latter is integral to the foundation system (vs. a way to contain concrete), meaning it forms part of the structure. Also, whereas ICFs are concrete cores sandwiched between two pieces of rigid foam, The Perfect Block ICCF is more like what Ben describes as “honeycomb cells.” In the case of this project, the foundation is a grid of 6-in. by 6-in. columns 12 in. on center, and 6-in. by 6-in. beams 12 in. on center—together, the vertical and horizontal structure create a latticework of support, or a screen grid. It provides continuous insulation and has an R-value of 28. Ben says the cost comes in just below that of a conventional concrete foundation wall. For this project, there was an increase because of current shipping costs; the material alone was $29K.
安装很简单。4英尺宽的10英寸深乘12英寸,高高的块被涂抹,轻巧(每个大约40磅),并且很容易手工移动;它们可以用无绳索(甚至是手锯)切割,并直接堆叠在彼此的顶部,并用泡沫粘合剂固定,而无需运行键。
Here, the bulk of the foundation is 6-ft. tall—that’s six blocks high. The crew installed #5 rebar on 24-in. centers (the rebar falls on the center of every other core) up to the height of the first three blocks (3 ft.). Then they tied in another piece with a 12-in. lap and stacked the final three blocks. Staggering the rebar in lifts meant they weren’t reaching up over 6-ft.-tall rebar to stack the blocks.
获得第一个课程水平和铅液至关重要。对连续课程的重点是成为铅垂。垫片被使用,因为块被堆叠以使它们保持在路线上。它们与连续的粘合剂膨胀的泡沫粘合在一起,并在两侧和关节上沿壁的整个长度粘合在一起。由三名成员组成的船员在两周内堆叠了整个基金会。除了进入速度外,Ben还指出了另一个好处:由于产品的涂层,切割的碎屑不会在工作现场吹来,这在标准EPS表单中发生。
根据本的说法,一个陷阱是工程师与该产品一起工作的舒适度。在这种情况下,工程师的计划要求#4钢筋12英寸在垂直和水平的中间。相反,球队在24英寸上排名第5。中心,将时间表几乎减少了一半。该工程师还在块的外部将1/2英寸的水泥板规定,因为ICCF制造商没有任何测试结果可以显示该产品在这种环境中的性能。(值得注意的是,他们没有23年的记录,没有失败)。设计建造团队退后一步,感到预防措施是不必要的。取而代之的是,他们选择在外部使用岩圈舒适板,因为他们相信它具有足够的抗压强度,可以在整个基础墙上分配土壤压力负荷。
Asked what he thinks about the system, Ben responds, “It earns its name, in my experience. We are looking at integrating it as a standard foundation for our future projects.”
_________________________________________________________________________
Kiley Jacques is senior editor at Green Building Advisor. Illustration by Patrick Welsh.Photos by Brian McAward.
Weekly Newsletter
Get building science and energy efficiency advice, plus special offers, in your inbox.
6 Comments
I have to wonder if this system is suitable for all soil types. In the Red River Valley of the north, 8" poured concrete walls are the norm with steel reinforcement. Water tables are high there seasonally and sumps run every couple of minutes in the spring and after heavy rains. Drain tile on both sides of the exterior footings is used. The RRV soils move a lot when frozen so the walls have to be able to withstand this.
我喜欢这里描述的系统和较低的碳足迹。在苛刻的土壤中,应考虑这种类型的粉底墙的强度。
Most engineers will call for an 8" thick monolithic concrete pour wall for an ICF basement. Sometimes you MIGHT get away with a 6" thick wall but 90% of the time it's 8". So a honeycomb pour wall basement system would be a no-go in most areas. At least that is my take on it.
我不喜欢蜂窝墙上的上述应用,更不用说低于等级了。
有谁在天气中有任何经验,或者没有覆盖EP的水泥的水泥,对昆虫和啮齿动物提供了现实世界的抵抗力?
谢谢!
Ben
我认为,从轮辋到坡度低几英寸的1/2水泥板是保护损坏的好主意,并为您提供表面拧紧/钉子的石板贴面壁板。还只是为了保护泡沫免受杂草修剪,割草机等的侵害。
在欧洲某些地区使用Simprolit,在使用这种类型的块方面有很多经验。
https://www.simprolit.com/
蜂窝墙低于等级及以上。该块是抗昆虫的。它确实需要进行防水,因为它像普通的Cocrete一样吸收水。
Log in or create an account to post a comment.
Sign up Log in