区域6基础绝缘
Zone 6 Foundation Insulation
现有条件：
1 75 foot long ranch log home built in 1984 in southern Vermont (zone 6).
2 1/3的基础是地下室车库。
3 2/3 is unvented crawl space of 3-7 feet high with a “Clean Space” basement system with drains and sump pump.
4历史山水径流已经减轻了许多手挖出房屋10'-20'。经过一年的雪花，在油底壳泵盆中没有水，导致我相信周围的土壤相当干燥。
5现在我必须隔离墙壁，并担心水分驱动器进入体窗板（没有毛细血管中断）。
提出的保温组件：
1 3“XPS似乎是过多的蒸发性并且会导致向上驱动到门槛板上。一种可能的节约恩典可能是在周边周围的混凝土（高于等级）1-5'的能力，以释放水分。
2是否会智能化为XPS到1 1/2“，以控制露点，并在其余组件中使用刚性摇滚靴覆盖，允许更高的烫发额定值？
3 This assembly would be duplicated in the garage with the addition of furring strips to support sheetrock.
I have read every post you have had regarding this subject and understand the stated assembly of #1 matches your recommendation. Am I overthinking vapor permeability and sill plate problems?
在一篇文章中，马丁提到了绝缘背后的凹坑垫的可能性。您能否在该程序集中扩展，因为我找不到任何其他信息？
Thank you for all the information. Quite helpful and fascinating.
Signed,
“学到了足够的人真的陷入困境”
GBA详细资料库
A collection of one thousand construction details organized by climate and house part
Replies
将XPS限制为0“。它是非常不绿色（HFC发泡剂），过于蒸气。
将外部与1.5-2“的EPS（戊烷吹气剂，非常低的冲击）从基础的顶部到等级低于等级的几英尺，并使用3”摇滚羊毛音响减排蝙蝠（或R15 Studwall Batts，如便宜）在内部。这样，组装主要朝着内部进行干燥，并满足IRC的规定R15最小绝缘。
弄清楚如何安装闪烁以将水从墙上的泡沫到外面的泡沫外，远离基础，并在外部泡沫上使用鹅卵石保护涂层 - 有些人只是使用直接涂上灰泥刮涂层的涂抹在粗糙的eps上，但也有涂抹特定材料（例如Quikrete泡沫涂层）。
您可以在用鸡丝绑在墙壁上的内部进行R15 Batts（没有铆钉），没有EPS但没有外部EPS，将进入基础墙壁和较慢的干燥速度。
With any approach a ground vapor barrier is necessary in the crawl space, sealed to the foundation wall.
XPS is reclaimed can’t do anything about the purchase order 20yrs ago but I’d rather use it now then see it in a landfill. If I’m wrong about that please educate me.
Thank you for the suggestion unfortunately due to large ledge rock exterior would be problematic, not impossible but I’ve done enough feather and wedge through boulders for a lifetime.
我更关心在考虑到外部混凝土的干燥潜力，考虑到主要在阳光下，大部分水都在温暖的泥潭期间。
I would just jack up the house and slip in a cap break but the logs make the weight and access difficult.
There probably isn’t an answer but thanks anyway
RK, XPS use is absolutely proper in that circumstance as it isn't new and can be considered reclaimed. We were all a lot more ignorant 20 years ago. My lashing came from my seeing so many people "today" who don't have any excuse for their ignorance. I apologize for chastising you for something you didn't deserve.
@Dana,
I'm very grateful to you, as I'm sure many others are, that you continue to let people know about the damaging effects to the planet of the manufacture and use of XPS insulation. But I have to say that I can only marvel at your patience with people who come here for advice. I sincerely wish I had it too. How many times does it need to be said before people GET IT about XPS. You have the patience of Job and are doing God's ( or whatever your belief system supports) work.
也许一些管理工具可以内置于Q＆A结构中，使得甚至在提交问题之前，也会鼓励个人不使用XPS？对我而言，我不能为他人说话，这是一个不断的刺激来源，即必须增加这种补救理解以回答更实质性问题。
In two more years, regulations pending in California, NY, Connecticut and Maryland will ban HFCs in XPS, which will force US manufacturers to at least offer greener XPS, if not switch over entirely. It's too bad that consumer pressure isn't sufficient to switch before then, but at least there's light at the end of the tunnel.
Hi R K -
如果您的基础周围有疗法和地面水，使得您当前的混凝土和系叶板的水分含量没有提升，那么我的方法将是：继续内部或外部绝缘计划，并仅仅监测水分板的水分含量随着时间的推移;这就是我在自己的家中近20年所做的事情：//m.etiketa4.com/green-homes/deep-energy-makeover-one-step-at-aoStime.。和：//m.etiketa4.com/article/anuderground-roof.。
由于我的脚没有看到地下水位，我已经在我的100岁加上的地基围绕了地面水，我与基础墙接触的框架从未升高（我检查一楼的水分含量 - 这是进入基础 - 每个春天，总是很好。