空气屏障系统的常见部件是浇注混凝土;窗台上密封;壁板;housewrap;承包商的磁带;捻缝;喷雾泡沫;垫圈;车窗玻璃;干墙; polyethylene; and weatherstripping. If any of these materials are leaky, the home’s air barrier may be compromised.
博士并不意味着更聪明。证据，就是斯劳布先生。 你觉得“可控”通风更好吗?试着一年建造数百个家庭，并意识到不知情的居住者现在真正控制着“可控”的新鲜空气。作为一名医生，你敢把一个容易被干扰的新鲜空气源比作比自然空气更“安全”或“干净”的空气吗?如果你的受控呼吸机是一个移动部件，一定会失灵....失灵会发生什么?阁楼上的死松鼠更糟糕，还是唯一的通风管道里的死老鼠????嗯?奶奶在不知道蜂巢在他们的新鲜空气入口的情况下喷了一个马蜂窝?房主会自动知道如何检查/维护新风系统吗?顺便说一下，新闻快讯....大多数空气泄漏不是渗透“错误”，但他们是门，窗户，和扩大缝隙的护套制造商要求。 Why are these gaps actually the best source of fresh air possible today? Because they are 1/8" all the way around the house, bulletproof, 100% foolish occupant proof fresh air. Should you have to filter outdoor air to make it good quality air? Oh crap the Dr. didn't mention outdoor air is the STANDARD of air quality. Dr. Needs to find a different subject to talk about, tell me something, if I asked you "If every home in the country had an ERV and supertight house, how many houses in this country would have a 100% properly designed/maintained/operating fresh air system?" Unless you can whole-heartadly say ALL HOMES WOULD RECEIVE .35ACH OR BETTER, 100%, than your WHOLE argument on this page is you wasting people's time with YOUR ignorance. HEALTH always trumps some Dr.s dream energy savings. Try something that will help you Dr, try building homes for a while before you mislead people on how it should be done! Give back your doctorite! I lived in a home over 130 years old, no air barriers, no thermal barriers, no science.....it was in EXCELLENT condition. Guess we should have had more Dr.s input 130 years ago, so that houses can last longer? Controlled fresh air can work, as long as a Dr. in home energy lives there and takes care of the system. For the rest of housing, please take this page based on home building ignorance off of the web.
5个评论
喜欢“死松鼠”
喜欢“死松鼠”这个比喻。
老房子漏气
．..那么，一个人应该如何正确地(或至少是建筑所能提供的最好的)密封一个1945年的房子?我有一栋两层的科德角公寓，地下室全是，循环供暖，墙壁没有隔热层，底层用砖砌，上层用木墙板。我确实有新窗户。冬天的天然气费用远远超过200美元。我原来的外部护套实际上是18英寸高，8英寸宽的石膏板，看起来像(希望如此!)一个轻型建筑纸(黑色)背衬。没有其他蒸汽/湿气屏障。石膏板条也被用作室内的板条，上面覆盖着灰泥。这让我有点担心，在冷凝的情况下，墙壁的绝缘问题。谢谢你的评论。
应对杰森
杰森,
通常的方法被称为鼓风机门导向空气密封。它是由气象承包商或家庭性能承包商执行的。想要了解更多，请看鼓风机门基础知识．
博士并不意味着更聪明。证据，就是斯劳布先生。
你觉得“可控”通风更好吗?试着一年建造数百个家庭，并意识到不知情的居住者现在真正控制着“可控”的新鲜空气。作为一名医生，你敢把一个容易被干扰的新鲜空气源比作比自然空气更“安全”或“干净”的空气吗?如果你的受控呼吸机是一个移动部件，一定会失灵....失灵会发生什么?阁楼上的死松鼠更糟糕，还是唯一的通风管道里的死老鼠????嗯?奶奶在不知道蜂巢在他们的新鲜空气入口的情况下喷了一个马蜂窝?房主会自动知道如何检查/维护新风系统吗?顺便说一下，新闻快讯....大多数空气泄漏不是渗透“错误”，但他们是门，窗户，和扩大缝隙的护套制造商要求。 Why are these gaps actually the best source of fresh air possible today? Because they are 1/8" all the way around the house, bulletproof, 100% foolish occupant proof fresh air. Should you have to filter outdoor air to make it good quality air? Oh crap the Dr. didn't mention outdoor air is the STANDARD of air quality. Dr. Needs to find a different subject to talk about, tell me something, if I asked you "If every home in the country had an ERV and supertight house, how many houses in this country would have a 100% properly designed/maintained/operating fresh air system?" Unless you can whole-heartadly say ALL HOMES WOULD RECEIVE .35ACH OR BETTER, 100%, than your WHOLE argument on this page is you wasting people's time with YOUR ignorance. HEALTH always trumps some Dr.s dream energy savings. Try something that will help you Dr, try building homes for a while before you mislead people on how it should be done! Give back your doctorite! I lived in a home over 130 years old, no air barriers, no thermal barriers, no science.....it was in EXCELLENT condition. Guess we should have had more Dr.s input 130 years ago, so that houses can last longer? Controlled fresh air can work, as long as a Dr. in home energy lives there and takes care of the system. For the rest of housing, please take this page based on home building ignorance off of the web.
回应格雷格·赫克
格雷格,
因为你的评论中有很多对约翰·斯特劳贝的侮辱，很难确定你的观点。但是，如果我猜对了，听起来你更喜欢住在一个没有机械通风系统的漏水的房子里，而不是住在一个有机械通风系统的严密的房子里。
虽然很多人住在这样的房子里，但这样的房子有一个大问题:冬天取暖夏天降温需要消耗很多能源。而浪费能源(只是让能量从家里的信封泄漏出去)是一种奢侈，大多数人——以及整个地球——再也承受不起了。
登录或创建一个帐户来发表评论。
报名 登录